PDA

View Full Version : New Addition



Win2Win
25th January 2006, 22:10
I've added a new catergory to the free page Late Info section.

Called the 'Golden Lay', it will be at least one bet specified as LAY for a win lay, or PLACE for a place lay.

I expect these to be profitable. UK racing days only.

Results will be listed on the 'systems' page. It is method, but no space anywhere else :)

Street cry
25th January 2006, 22:13
Thanks Keith can i stick these in with the falsies (spread sheet wise ) Or is a new spread sheet called for.

Win2Win
25th January 2006, 22:15
It'll only be one most days, so slip it in where it fits best.....Ooo

Street cry
25th January 2006, 22:22
He said

mathare
26th January 2006, 14:00
Fixed stake or fixed liability - what do you reckon Keith?

presto
26th January 2006, 14:26
good start

Win2Win
26th January 2006, 17:41
good start
Not for the owner :laugh

I'd go for FS, Mat.

Sandman
28th January 2006, 12:43
If I use this system, it will be my first venture into Laying(!).
Could someone advise the best way to go about these? Start with a bank.. . and stake how much?

wb
28th January 2006, 12:47
If I use this system, it will be my first venture into Laying(!).
Could someone advise the best way to go about these? Start with a bank.. . and stake how much?


Im going to use 4% liability on each selection

wb
28th January 2006, 12:48
Just to add.....

the problem with betfair, is that if you don't start with a larg-ish bank, you will have to get around the £2 min. bet thingy

Sandman
28th January 2006, 13:17
Oh I see. Or do I?
So if the selection is, say, 4-1, and my bank is £100...
Then I lay £1?

sparkyminer
28th January 2006, 13:23
If it's 4 on betfair then your stake is £1.33 but generally you're correct.

Sandman
28th January 2006, 13:26
Ah yeh... £1.33.
Cheers Sparky!

wb
28th January 2006, 13:35
Oh I see. Or do I?
So if the selection is, say, 4-1, and my bank is £100...
Then I lay £1?

If you decide to use 4% liability, this means you will have to pay out 4% of your bank for each winner. You can play around with this on betfair before you log on, to get an idea of the figures.

Using the 4/1 example:

That would be 5.0 on betfair. So yes, you would need to have the backers stake at £1. (there may be a problem with the betfair minimum here though)

Another example:

the horse is 7.4, and your bank is £120.

4% of £120 is £4.80,
so £4.80 is amount you stand to loose if the horse wins.

that would be a backers stake of 75p - again, this would be under the min. bet thing though



(Im not sure if 4% is a good figure or not, Im sure Keith will advise)

Sandman
28th January 2006, 13:40
Thank you.
The minimum bet thingy looks like it will be a problem!

wb
28th January 2006, 13:41
There is a way around it, but I don't think we are allowed to post it on the general forum

wb
28th January 2006, 13:42
Its probrally on google though

sparkyminer
28th January 2006, 13:44
It's a sticky somewhere.

sparkyminer
28th January 2006, 13:47
Offer to lay at 1.01 at minimum stake. Bet will be unmatched. Change stake to add your lay on top of minimum. Cancel original lay at minimum stake. Alter your remaining lay to the odds you require.:)

Micky T
28th January 2006, 15:01
You could always take a bigger risk to kick start the system and lay everything to win £2.00 with a cut off at 9.8,

which also makes it easier when starting.

tophatter
28th January 2006, 15:15
Thats what I would suggest. Fixed stake should be more stable too becuase more often than not your liability will be short of the maximum unless its right at your cut off. So I would say with a £100 start bank, laying to win £2.00 should be safe enough and if you leave that stake at £2 until you have trebled the bank the risk will go down as bank grows.

wb
28th January 2006, 16:01
What cut-off would you reccommend TH? I think somewhere around 9.8 as mickey said would be a good idea.

mathare
28th January 2006, 16:02
I'd suggest using 10 or 11. I use 11 as it keeps the number nice and neat, equating to 10/1

tophatter
28th January 2006, 18:04
I use 10 Wayne. Nothing to stop you using a lower cut off of 9.00 or even 8.00 if you want.

presto
28th January 2006, 18:11
i am going to 'assume' ( :rolleyes: ) that the odd's arn't going to be that high on the golden lays, so the cut off shouldn't come into play that much, especially if there are place lays.

Iron Chris
7th February 2006, 23:12
Great stuff with these... :spinning .. thanks.

Win2Win
9th February 2006, 20:36
Do these need fixing yet?