View Full Version : Prostitute Murders
Win2Win
7th February 2008, 19:15
How much of our monay are we spending on this case?
The defendants story is about as realistic as Vegy riding IPLEDGEALLEGIANCE to Gold Cup victory :rolleyes:
Surely we can get rid of some trials, and have the case looked at by say 11 independent judges, and they decide on guilt.
You can't tell me that a jury made up of today's highly driven intelligent people (:laugh) understand what is going on. They can just about stay focused for Eastenders, never mind weeks of mind nubbing legal cobblers.
And the bonus.....He found a body and had sex with it :laugh .....always carry some Vaseline in case of an emergency does he?? ::hump Did he leave a tip :ooo
mathare
7th February 2008, 21:32
Aren't you confusing two different cases here?
Steven Wright is accused of murdering the five prostitutes in Suffolk. He has admitted using prostitutes and that his partner knew nothing of this.
The accused in the Sally Anne Bowman case claims he didn't murder her but did find her body (in her driveway) after a night out on drink and drugs and had sex with it, but he didn't kill her.
scoobydoo
7th February 2008, 21:57
Aren't you confusing two different cases here?
The accused in the Sally Anne Bowman case claims he didn't murder her but did find her body (in her driveway) after a night out on drink and drugs and had sex with it, but he didn't kill her.
What a defence this is....I mean hes probably going for the sympathy vote with the jury here is he! :cuck I would convict him just for this defence I think!
Win2Win
7th February 2008, 22:32
Everything comes down to one single entity in the Universe Mat :rolleyes:
I only watch the news in between races/sport, so get it in mixed clips :laugh
Either way, both cases can be found guility/not guitly without all this drawn out money wasting crap.
Anyone on here stiffed a stiff? :yikes:
mathare
8th February 2008, 14:03
It seems that Steven Wright is now claiming to have picked up the Suffolk prostitutes in the order that they disappeared but didn't murder them. It's apparently just a massive coincidence that he picked up five hookers and that they were murdered in the same order as he visited them.
Win2Win
8th February 2008, 15:02
Betting market closed :D
susanwells
9th February 2008, 13:42
Well put it this way..if it really, really wasn`t Wright, how come there hasn`t been a single new murder of a prostitute in Ipswich since they arrested him. I mean, if he really, really hadn`t murdered them, surely whoever had would have been having a field day ever since - no surveillance, police all gone home, prostitutes out and about because they`re feeling safe again.... Hm. :yikes:
tophatter
9th February 2008, 13:51
You still have to have a trial if the accused pleads not guilty no matter have much the ecidence is weighed againt them and a jury system is probably the most open way of doing so.
Its the old slippery slope scenario again if you chip away at those basic principles no matter how time consuming or expensive they are. I do think maybe there is a case for having specialist juries in certain fields such as a complicated fraud but in the main I think our justice system is pretty much how it should be.
Win2Win
9th February 2008, 15:06
Well I'm pretty sure judges in a closed room would have dismissed the Fallon trial, as a judge done that anyway......have we'd paid a few £Million for the privilege.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.