7th August 2009 - Lingfield

[TheActuary]

I am hoping I have not posted this in the wrong place but reading the descriptions this appears the most appropriate place. If I am wrong please advise!

No interest at all in the first 2 AW

If the tissue price of 10-1 Kingsgate Castlev1 is available must be a solid E.W. A couple of non-runners to his inside wouldn't go a miss as 9 is a bit to wide over 6f. Dynamo Dave still isnt sure if he is a sprinter or middle distance horse. LTO on the AW was running over 10f!!

Baby Josr 12-1 looks the pick of a modest bunch in the last. The trip would be questionable in better company but solid E.W. claims

[TheActuary]

Not sure whether that was good or bad!!!

Brambleberry 1st 10-1 not after timing advertised on my blog but never expected it to be an E.W. price.

Then the fun begins with Kingsgate Castle backed from 10-1 down to 7-2 gets badly hampered and out with the washing after 2f.

Baby Josr drifts from 10-1 out to 16-1 gets badly hampered by Miss Tikitiboo and finishes like an express train to grab second.

Obviously I have made money on the day but still feel I have been robbed of a 16-1 winner.

Perhaps focusing on tomorrow's Lingfield meeting will quiet this uneasy feeling I have inside!!

[TheActuary]

Two reasonable E.W. bets in my top rated on the AW today but neither are likely to be E.W. prices currently showing at 5-1 & 7-1 so I will bow out gracefully today and just watch with interest.

All ratings are on my blog for those interested.

Two meetings to get my teeth in to on Monday with Southwell and Wolverhampton.

[TheOldhamWhisper]

In case you are wondering why nobody is replying, it is because your posts are in a moderated queue which is in place to stop people advertising for free.

Your two posts:

The first mentions that a horse that you strangely ommitted from this site seeminly won at 10-1 and you had it on your blog. It would have been more impressive if the winner had been posted BEFORE running.

The second doesn't mention any horses names but seems to be trying to direct people to your blog.

There are blog facilities on this site - you are welcome to use them. BUT any more attempts to direct people to a different site will be dealt with swiftly and result in a life-time ban.

[TheActuary]

2.15 Southwell Favours Brave 89 16-1 looks a good EW bet if it can reproduce its LTO Polytrack form on the Fibresand. The furlong shorter should assist in coping with the more testing surface.

3.15 Southwell My top rated Crimson Mitre 91 12-1 lively EW chance and only C&D in the race.

3.45 Southwell Swiss Art 92 a Southwell specialist marginally top rated but would take 10-1 EW if available. Rarely out of the frame here.

4.15 Southwell Luscivious 95 is likely to go off to short to interest me.

4.45 Southwell My top rated First Blade seems to have a new lease of life with blinkers but at the current price of 5-1 to short for me.

[TheActuary]

strangely ommitted from this site seeminly won at 10-1

And here lies my problem! I am unable to predict prices and as you are probably aware if you have an interest in Horse Racing, overnight tissues are widely inaccurate and not to be relied upon.

The horse in question was not 'strangely omitted', it simply didn't look feasible that it would be 10-1 plus which is a pre-requisite for me to make it a bet.

It didn't seemingly win, the result section of any website or racing publication will reflect the horse did actually win as will my time stamped blog reflect it was my selection for the race the evening before.

I may be unique in not simply wanting to throw up selections to a forum that I have no intentions of backing myself. When I post I have a burden of expectation and am wracked with guilt if that selection loses.

In reality I also feel I have something to offer any forum that accepts me and I feel posting to your Forum is more a positive for you than a negative. I am unsure of any the motivation behind Forums banning someone for pointing to a resource of information in a manner I have stolen from you. The input was mine to begin with!

I am sure you can convince yourself in to whatever decision you choose to make and justify it. Inadvertently I should be thanking you for not allowing my posts for today as I had a shocker. Tomorrow is another day and we play again.

[TheOldhamWhisper]

As a moderator on this site for almost 7 years, I can honestly say that I've heard just about every possible excuse from spammers - the rules are simple:

Any attempt to divert people from this site to another horse-racing/gambling/commercial site without prior permission from the owner is considered to be against the rules and it is entirely up to the owner of the forum to decide whether or not to allow the poster to continue as a member of the forum.

I will make you a deal - remove the link to your blog from your profile and I will unblock your posts and people can judge your posts on their merit.

As I mentioned earlier, you are quite welcome to use our blogging facilities.

[TheOldhamWhisper]

As you didn't remove the link to your blog when asked, we have taken the liberty of removing it for you so that you don't infringe any rules of the forum. Consequently, I have now made your posts available to the rest of the forum and people can judge for themselves.