PDA

View Full Version : Hall's 'unduly lenient' term doubled



Win2Win Racing
26th July 2013, 15:53
Former BBC broadcaster Stuart Hall's 15-month sentence for a series of indecent assaults is doubled by the Court of Appeal.

More... (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-23460778#sa-ns_mchannel=rss&ns_source=PublicRSS20-sa)

Hall's 'unduly lenient' term doubled

Win2Win
27th July 2013, 12:30
What a naughty boy :spank: .... It should be 10 years minimum for what he done :anerikke:

barneymather
27th July 2013, 15:57
The image Hall and Savile had in the 70s was one
more of less of national treasure but now the reputation of each couldn't sink any lower.

Both had the gall to face the camera, laugh and joke with the public and present themselves as everybody's friend yet all the time they were abusing young people.

Beyond belief and I'm certain there were those at the BBC who knew or at least strongly suspected either of wrongdoing but did nothing about it in case it harmed their careers.

Hall has to live with the guilt and shame and so should other BBC employees who did nothing about his and Savile's behaviour.

MattR
27th July 2013, 23:50
So with our laughable serving of prison time that means as it is doubled he now actually serves 15 months. What a joke the sentencing is. And don't even get me started on sentences for other crimes running concurrently.

Win2Win
28th July 2013, 08:16
Remember that Lester Piggott got 12 months for tax fraud..... so stealing off the government is nearly as bad as child abuse :crazy: :voodoo:

barneymather
28th July 2013, 22:50
I can't see the point when one sentence is handed out for one crime and another sentence is given for a different offence as I've never heard of the jail terms being given consecutively - they're always concurrent.

Where's the sense in that? It just seems to be a legal box which has to be ticked. The judge has to issue separate sentences for different offences but he always makes the term concurrent, although I'm sure judicial discretion could be used at least some of the time to make the sentence consecutive. However, the lily-livered judge invariably chickens out of invoking the latter option.

Financial wrongdoing always attracts a stiff sentence. Someone nicks a load of cash - and I'm talking money obtained via fraud rather than violence - and you read of offenders getting 6 or 8 years. Yet rapists and child abusers receive lesser sentences. Is our legal system :censored: up or what?

vegyjones
28th July 2013, 23:59
So with our laughable serving of prison time that means as it is doubled he now actually serves 15 months. What a joke the sentencing is. And don't even get me started on sentences for other crimes running concurrently.

Plus he'll get the last four months out on electronic tag so will only actually serve 11 months in prison

Win2Win
29th July 2013, 09:44
They should wire the electric tag straight into the mains and fry the bugger :biggrin:

MattR
29th July 2013, 15:09
It is ridiculous. It's basically saying if you commit a crime you may as well do a few more similar ones as you'll only serve time for one of them :rolleyes:

barneymather
29th July 2013, 19:48
They should wire the electric tag straight into the mains and fry the bugger :biggrin:

I'll put the money in the meter. Dirty old get. 80 odd Hall may be, but another wrinkly crim might just shout "It's a knockout" and clobber the suntanned sleazo.

Win2Win
30th July 2013, 08:20
I see Twitter have said they will now include a button. To be honest, they should have one, as it is the only way to start putting a stop to stupid trolls.

scoobydoo
30th July 2013, 13:32
We seem to have gone from a country that maybe was once too harsh on criminals to one now where punishments dont fit the crime at all.

Win2Win
31st July 2013, 08:16
Well we can't jail people, we need to think about their human rights :rolleyes: .... plus think of the cost of keeping someone in jail, it is cheaper to give them a holiday in Las Vegas :crazy:

tovarich
31st July 2013, 09:24
Or turn the prisons into holiday camps.
Prisons should be corrective not educational and when you are sent to prison you should lose all your basic rights. Prison life shoud be such that when you come out you will be determined not to go back in again.

No pool tables, only two hours of TV a night, no Sky TV, no football on Wednesday afternoons, no mobile phones allowed.

Three meals a day, yes (unlike some OAP's) Warm centrally heated accommodation, ok (unlike some OAP's)

You should all vote for Tov to be put in charge of the judiciary, I'd sort the *******s out.:headbange

Win2Win
31st July 2013, 09:43
No football!!!! Execution would be much kinder :laugh

tovarich
31st July 2013, 23:01
Got to say I'm all for bringing back Capital Punishment, especially for killing Police Officers and anyone who has not reached their 18th birthday. (Children)

Maybe some day!

Win2Win
1st August 2013, 10:29
Plus anyone over 65 who is a drain on society :wink: :laugh

barneymather
1st August 2013, 20:36
Oo-er, I just hope Keith hasn't incurred the wrath of notorious organisation the BAP (Bad Assed Pensioners) with that comment.

They say that if you find a discarded Werther's Original wrapper outside your front door you're a goner. :yikes:

A rumoured favourite method of BAP in disposing with their enemies is suffocation with a copy of The People's Friend.

Win2Win
2nd August 2013, 09:44
I hear that Price Charles hates really old people as well.... one in particular :laugh